Philippines Anti-Cybercrime Police Groupe MOST WANTED PEOPLE List!
#1 Mick Jerold Dela CruzPresent Address: 1989 C. Pavia St. Tondo, Manila If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: |
#2 Gremelyn NemucoPresent Address; One Rockwell, Makati City
If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: |
#3 Vinna VargasAddress: Imus, Cavite
If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: |
#4 Ivan Dela CruzPresent Address: Imus, Cavite
If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: |
#5 Elton DanaoPermanent Address: 2026 Leveriza, Fourth Pasay, Manila
If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: |
#6 Virgelito DadaPresent Address: Grass Residences, Quezon City
If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: |
#7 John Christopher SalazarPermanent address: Rivergreen City Residences, Sta. Ana, Manila
If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: |
#8 Xanty Octavo
If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
|
#9 Daniel BocoAddress: Imus, Cavite
If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
|
#10 James Gonzalo TulabotPermanent Address: Blk. 4 Lot 30, Daisy St. Lancaster Residences, Alapaan II-A, Imus, Cavite
If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: |
#11 Lea Jeanee Belleza
If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: |
#12 Juan Sonny Belleza
If you have any information about that person please call to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines: Contact Numbers: Complaint Action Center / Hotline: |
OUTSTRIVE SOLUTIONS PH CALL CENTER SERVICES
Solidbank did not present to the trial court Teller No. 6, the teller with whom Calapre left the passbook and who was supposed to return the passbook to him. The record does not indicate that Teller No. 6 verified the identity of the person who retrieved the passbook. Solidbank also failed to adduce in evidence its standard procedure in verifying the identity of the person retrieving the passbook, if there is such a procedure, and that Teller No. 6 implemented this procedure in the present case. However, the fiduciary nature of a bank-depositor relationship does not convert the contract between the bank and its depositors from a simple loan to a trust agreement, whether express or implied. Failure by the bank to pay the depositor is failure to pay a simple loan, and not a breach of trust. The law simply imposes on the bank a higher standard of integrity and performance in complying with its obligations under the contract of simple loan, beyond those required of non-bank debtors under a similar contract of simple loan. Diaz was also negligent in entrusting its deposits to its messenger and its messenger in leaving the passbook with the teller, Solidbank could not escape liability because of the doctrine of “last clear chance.” Solidbank could have averted the injury suffered by L.C. Calapre went to Solidbank and presented to Teller No. 6 the two deposit slips and the passbook. The teller acknowledged receipt of the deposit by returning to Calapre the duplicate copies of the two deposit slips.
In Apollo, the CA dismissed the Petition for the Annulment of the Partial Compromise Agreement dated June 24, 2002, the Order denying the Motion for Reconsideration dated July 4, 2003, the Order denying the Motion for Partial Judgment dated December 9, 2005 and the Partial Judgment and the Writ issued pursuant thereto. The directive given by the Swiss court for the foundations to participate in the proceedings was for the purpose of protecting whatever nominal interest they might have had in the assets as formal owners. The rulings of the Swiss court that the foundations, as formal owners, must be given an opportunity to participate in the proceedings hinged on the assumption that they owned a nominal share of the assets. Under the “res inter alios acta nocere non debet” rule, respondent Tayud is not bound by any statements, acts or omissions of other parties. Again, they claim that the parcels of land included in the assailed Orders and Writ are distinct and separate from those claimed by respondent Tayud Golf. In finding that out of the 108 parcels of land being claimed by respondent Tayud Golf, 106 parcels were included in the Affidavit of Quitclaim and Waiver, the CA based such conclusion on the very same Affidavit of Quitclaim and Waiver. In stating that respondent Tayud Golf had a claim of ownership over 108 parcels of land, the CA had as its basis the Deed of Assignment executed by Apollo Homes in favor of the same respondent. Therefore, this Court, based on the fourth exception above-cited, may resolve the errors enumerated by petitioners in the present petition. The former claims that under Rule 45, Section 1, which the latter avail themselves of, only questions of law and not of facts must be raised. Petitioner has been paying the real estate taxes thereof as evidenced by various tax clearances issued on March 13, 2007 covering seventy-nine properties, and their respective real estate tax receipts.
VENECIA, JR., THE SENATE, REPRESENTED BY HON. SENATE PRESIDENT FRANKLIN
Lastly, I fail to see the injustice in allowing the COMELEC to give due course to and take cognizance of Lambino and Aumentado’s petition for initiative to amend the Constitution. I reiterate that it would be a greater evil if one such petition which is ostensibly supported by the required number of registered voters all over the country, be summarily dismissed. Neither can the COMELEC dismiss Lambino and Aumentado’s petition for initiative on the basis of this Court’s Resolution, dated 23 September 1997, in the case of People’s Initiative for Reform, Modernization and Action v. The Commission on Elections, et al. The Court therein found that the COMELEC did not commit grave abuse of discretion in dismissing the PIRMA Petition for initiative to amend the Constitution for it only complied with the Decision in the Santiago case. While it is but proper to accord great respect and reverence to the Philippine Constitution of 1987 for being the supreme law of the land, we should not lose sight of the truth that there is an ultimate authority to which the Constitution is also subordinate – the will of the people. No less than its very first paragraph, the Preamble, expressly recognizes that the Constitution came to be because it was ordained and promulgated by the sovereign Filipino people. It is a principle reiterated yet again in Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution, which explicitly declares that “he Philippines is a democratic and republican State. Sovereignty resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them.” Thus, the resolution of the issues and controversies raised by the instant Petition should be guided accordingly by the foregoing principle. I fully agree with Justice Puno that all issues relating to the sufficiency of the initiative petitions should be remanded to the COMELEC. Rep. Act No. 6735 clearly reposes on the COMELEC the task of determining the sufficiency of the petitions, including the ascertainment of whether twelve percent (12%) of all registered voters, including three percent (3%) of registered voters in every legislative district have indeed signed the initiative petitions.
With Ricardo Bisquerra as spokesman, the group informed the President that the majority of the union members did not want to stage the strike. January 11.—PRESIDENT Magsaysay today ordered Defense Undersecretary Jose M. Crisol to send a Navy ship to Babuyan Claro Island to pick up inhabitants who might wish to resettle at the Perado EDCOR project in Isabela. January 10.—PRESIDENT Magsaysay gave the go-signal for the activation of six engineer combat battalions to help push through his rural development program and at the same time assists in the maintenance of peace and order, in the course of a conference this morning with Col. Antonio Chanco, chief of the AFP corps of engineers. He said that the new battalions would be useful in putting up roads and bridges in the hinterlands, particularly in areas where dissidents were still active. With the appointment of Fortunato de Leon as executive secretary, Mr. Yenko, who has been serving in that position for a few months, was automatically reverted to his permanent position as first assistant executive secretary. January 8.—AFTER breakfast with his family, the President held a two-hour conference this morning with government officials and discussed with them plans of expanding the cotton industry and ways and means of raising goats on a large scale. Present at the conference were ACCFA Administrator Osmundo Mondoñedo, NDC General Manager Jose H. Panganiban, ICA Chief Harry A. Brenn, and President George Adamson of the Adamson University.
RESPONDENTS.U.P. LAW ALUMNI CEBU FOUNDATION, INC., GOERING G.C.
Article XVII on amendments and revisions is called a “constitution of sovereignty” because it defines the constitutional meaning of “sovereignty of the people.” It is through these provisions that the sovereign people have allowed the expression of their sovereign will and have canalized their powers which would otherwise be plenary. By approving these provisions, the sovereign people have decided to limit themselves and future generations in the exercise of their sovereign power. They are thus bound by the constitution and are powerless, whatever their numbers, to change or thwart its mandates, except through the means prescribed by the Constitution itself. I am persuaded that we can approach the present issue in the same manner. The experience of the courts in California is not far removed from the standards expounded on by Dean Sinco when he set out to differentiate between amendment and revision. It is actually consistent, not only with our traditional concept of the two terms, but also with the mindset of our constitutional framers when they referred to the disquisition of Justice Antonio in Javellana. We must thus consider whether the proposed changes in this case affect our Constitution in both its substantial physical entirety and in its basic plan of government.
In addition, the notations on the MCs were written using both capital and small letters, while the other information on the checks were written using capital letters only, such difference could easily confuse an untrained eye and lead to a hasty conclusion that they were written by different typewriters. It bears to emphasize that the proceeds of the loans were paid to respondent stole my money in MCs, with the respondent specifically named as payee. MCs checks are drawn by the bank’s manager upon the bank itself and regarded to be as good as the money it represents.79 Moreover, the MCs were crossed checks, with the words “Payee’s Account Only.” Respondent’s outstanding obligation for ₱1,920,000.00 had been sufficiently documented by petitioner Citibank.
The Statute of Frauds; purpose; rules
The barangay assembly is composed of all persons who have been actual residents of the barangay for at least six months, who are at least 15 years of age and citizens of the Philippines. The holding of barangay plebiscites and referendum is also provided in Sections 100 and 101 of the same Code. We in Congress therefore, Mr. Speaker, are charged with the duty to implement the exercise by the people of the right of initiative and referendum. In other words, Mr. Speaker, under the 1987 Constitution, Congress does not have plenary powers. There is a reserved legislative power given to the people expressly. As a background, we want to point out the constitutional basis of this particular bill. The grant of plenary legislative power upon the Philippine Congress by the 1935, 1973 and 1987 Constitutions, Mr. Speaker, was based on the principle that any power deemed to be legislative by usage and tradition is necessarily possessed by the Philippine Congress unless the Organic Act has lodged it elsewhere.
For the Court to find the COMELEC to have abused its discretion when it dismissed the amended petition based on the ruling of this Court in Santiago would be sheer judicial apostasy. The proposed changes to the Constitution cover other subjects that are beyond the main proposal espoused by the petitioners. Apart from a shift from the presidential to a parliamentary form of government, the proposed changes include the abolition of one House of Congress, and the convening of a constituent assembly to propose additional amendments to the Constitution. Also included within its terms is an omnibus declaration that those constitutional provisions under Articles VI and VII, which are inconsistent with the unicameral-parliamentary form of government, shall be deemed amended to conform thereto.
RESTRIVERA, MAX VILLAESTER, AND EDILBERTO GALLOR, PETITIONERS, WORLD WAR II
I am the owner of the Modesta Village 1 and 2 in San Mateo, Rizal. I am also the President and Chairman of the Board of Macador Co. and Business Inc. which operates the Macador International Palace Hotel. Petitioners protest the award by the Court of Appeals of moral damages, exemplary damages, and attorney’s fees in favor of respondent. They argued that the RTC did not award any damages, and respondent, in her appeal before the Court of Appeals, did not raise in issue the absence of such.
- It fixes the effectivity date of the amendment under Section 9 which provides that “he proposition in an initiative on the Constitution approved by a majority of the votes cast in the plebiscite shall become effective as to the day of the plebiscite.”
- Since the present initiative embraces more than one subject matter, RA 6735 prohibits submission of the initiative petition to the electorate.
- There is no doubt that the Constitution, under Article XVII, has explicitly provided for the manner or method to effect amendments thereto, or revision thereof.
- If this Court allows today a cavalier change in the Constitution outside the constitutionally prescribed modes, tomorrow the new dominant political group that comes will demand its own set of changes in the same cavalier and unconstitutional fashion.
- Piecemeal presentation of evidence is simply not in accord with orderly justice.
The Chief Executive assured the delegation, accompanied by Rep. Diosdado Macapagal, that he would disapprove the proposed creation of the new town. About 1,000 people from the towns of Guimba, Bongabong, Zaragoza, Peñaranda, Gabaldon, Nampicuan, and Cabanatuan City in Nueva Ecija requested aid from the President for the early expropriation of Hacienda Triala in Guimba and for the construction of irrigation systems and artesian wells. The President ordered Land Tenure Commissioner Manuel Castañeda and the Department of Public Works and Communications to speed up the expropriation of landed estates and the construction of irrigation systems and artesian wells in Nueva Ecija. PRESIDENT Magsaysay received many callers this morning, among whom were former President and Mrs. Sergio Osmeña and Dr. Elpidio Valencia, son-in-law of the former President. The President was informed that Lagao was an ideal place for cotton planting and that if the target area could be fully planted and the crop harvested, that would mean millions of dollar saved for the country. The project will also mean the employment of thousands of laborers and the raising of the standard of living of the people. President Magsaysay directed Mondoñedo and Panganiban to plant from 10 to 15 thousand hectares of land in Lagao, Cotabato, to cotton. The ACCFA chief said that the FACOMAs had initiated the planting of some 300 hectares to cotton. The appointment of Crisol as chairman of this task force was a reiteration of the President’s full confidence in the organizational ability of the defense undersecretary, who will serve as the eyes and ears of the President.